|
Sequence comparison is a powerful tool for analyzing gene function. While
mutational analysis identifies alterations that interfere with gene function, comparison of
non-mutant sequences from different organisms will identify those sequences that do or do
not undergo genetic drift and are therefore retained by natural selection.
The mouse and human genomes, which on average have 86% and 88% sequence identity at nucleotide and protein level respectively, are too closely related to a common ancestor to reveal the regions that are necessarily conserved for functional regions. The most effective comparison is when the two genomes are not too similar and not too different. Such is the case with comparison between Fugu rubripes (the Japanese pufferfish) and human. The value of Fugu sequencing The Fugu genome contains about the same number of genes as the human genome. At the same time, orthologs from the pufferfish and human are different enough such that valuable structural and functional information can be extracted by simple comparison. Comparison between human and the pufferfish will reveal genes common to vertebrates and genes unique to mammals and fish. Between human and Fugu, intron/exon structures of most orthologues are conserved, and the coding exons but not the introns are conserved. Gene-prediction programs usually work much better on Fugu genomic sequence than on human genomic sequence, presumably because the Fugu genome is so much smaller. The experience of our laboratory and others illustrates the value of comparison with Fugu sequences in analyzing the human genome. For example, analysis of the 4q35 region was beset by a dispersed gene structure and the presence of repeats. In this case, comparison of human and Fugu sequences was essential in clarifying the organization of the region. Protein sequence comparison between pufferfish and human can reveal information about conserved protein domains and motifs. Short DNA elements that are responsible for transcription regulation are also conserved between human and the pufferfish. This enables us to identify regulatory elements by comparison of non-coding regions of orthologous human and pufferfish genes. Selected References, with an abstract
|